ֱ

×

Holy Cross Website Search

College Administrative Matters

 

The academic culture of ֱ is built on trust, which comes from the ongoing transparency, collegiality, and integrity of its members. 

“Integrity” means that something works tomaintainitself as an integrated whole. As an academic community, we expect everyone to be honest and transparent in all their academic work and to encourage and uphold the honesty and transparency of everyone else. 

By registering for courses, students pledge the following:

“As a member of ֱ, I acknowledge that it is my responsibility to learn and abide by the principles of academic integrity and pledge that I will neither participate in nor tolerate any form of academic dishonesty.”

Every faculty member has the responsibility to refer to this overall policy at the beginning of each semester in every course. Faculty have pledged to foster the honesty of their students by conducting each course in ways that discourage deceit, cheating, and plagiarism. Students should note that every member of the faculty isobligatedto investigate thoroughly any potential violation of this policy.

The following offencesconstitutefailures tomaintainthe above pledge and could result in grade penalty, disciplinary conference, probation, suspension, or dismissal.

Deceiving

Deceit includes lying and misrepresenting information, either about course work, attendance, or any other kind of record, in order tomislead or gain academic advantage.

Cheating

When a student submits any work for academic credit, the student makes an implicit claim that the work is wholly his or her own, completed without the assistance of any person or source not explicitly noted, and that the work (or any major portion of it) has not previously been submitted for academic credit in any other area. In the case of tests, quizzes, and examinations, the student also implicitly claims that he or she has obtained no prior unauthorized information about them and that he or she will neither give nor obtain any assistance during their taking. Cheating includes, but is not limited to:

  • Copying another person’s answers; 
  • Allowing someone to copy your work on assignments, quizzes, or tests, whether in paper or electronic format; 
  • Supplying or receiving drafts or completed papers, outlines, or research for a grade by any person other than the student; 
  • Supplying or receiving unauthorized information about the form or content of an examination prior to its administration; 
  • Supplying or receiving, during an exam, partial or complete answers, or suggestions for answers,assistancein the interpretation of questions on any examination from any source not explicitly authorized; 
  • Using unauthorized technologies (artificial intelligence, computer, calculator, cell phone, etc.) on examinations and assignments; 
  • Altering any instructional materials or resources and thereby interfering with another student’s work; 
  • Removingstudy or research materials and equipment intended for common use in assigned work without authorization. 
Plagiarizing

Plagiarizing is presenting another’s words or ideas as one’s own either by repeating the language of the original exactly (“verbatim”) without proper citation or by mixing one’s language with that of an original source’s in a way that obscures that origin. 

  • To avoid plagiarism, always cite when and where language or information comes from somewhere else. If you then quote the source verbatim, you must preserve the exact wording and punctuation, including any mistakes, andidentifythe original locations clearly and accuratelyby means ofcitation. 
  • Two main citation styles are used at the College. The first is the Chicago Style (CS), used in all Humanities courses. Within the CS are twopossible formats: the Notes & Bibliography format and the Author-Date & Bibliography format. Professors at ֱ typically prefer the Notes & Bibliography format. The second common style is “APA” style of the American Psychological Association, a style used also by other fields in the Social Sciences. You arewell-advisedto learn both citation styles. Online resources are plentiful. 
  • Paraphrasing is the restating of an idea or argument in your own words. Paraphrasing is legitimate and useful, but a paraphrase might still include some form of plagiarism. Makingsmall changesin the wording or arrangement of sourcematerial,forexample,does not avoid plagiarism. Remember: when you bring forward a fact or datum that is not common knowledge, or when you present some observation, insight, or argument that comes from somewhere else, you must always cite its ǰԲ source. Standard academic practice is to be dissatisfied with secondary sources: whenever possible, trace all sources of information and language back to their origins. If you do not use an established citation style, ormisapply inan established format, you expose your work to question and skepticism and will be given a warning or penalized.
  • Group projects are often essential to the learning process. The submission of group work implies a collaboration of ideas and shared responsibility for producing written and oral materials. Therefore, the violations of academic integrity listed aboveholdfor the group as well as individual group members.  
  • The availability of AI-assisted resources (e.g., Grammarly, ChatGPT, CoPilot, Gemini, and others) and online learning/editing services (e.g., Chegg)providesa means of both enhancing and hindering student learning.  Although you may use these resources while studying for this course, all graded assignments must be completed without the use of any AI-enabled resources, including Grammarly or other tools with similar functions to it, unless the instructor provides a specific exception and you include a proper citation.  These assignments include, but are not limited to, homework, quizzes, projects, papers, and exams.  Ifit appears that your workhas been partially/fully generated by AI, you will go through the reporting procedure outlined below, and your professor willdecidethe penalty for the incident. Your professor must file an ‘Academic Integrity IncidentReport’andyour professor might ask you to redo and resubmit thework ormight grant a zero on the assignment. Anysubsequentacademic integrity violations will be subject to proceedings of the Academic Honor Board as outlined in the student handbook.
Reportingand Consequences

Please be aware that the following reporting process is required of all faculty: 

  • In the event ofa suspected violation of academic integrity, the faculty member must contact the student and schedule a conference. The facultymemberwill present thestudent’swork in question, along with any evidence that supports the violation.  
  • An Academic Integrity Incident Report isinitiatedoutlining the violation, the resolution, and the agreed-upon penalty. The faculty memberdeterminestheappropriate penaltyand records it on the Academic Integrity Incident Report.  
  • The completed Academic Integrity Incident Report is thenforwardedto the Dean of Faculty, whose Office keeps a record of all incidents. This information is kept confidential, shared only in the case of a repeated violation, at the request of thestudent,or if the violation isdeemedto be egregious by the Dean of Faculty. The Academic Integrity Incident Report is destroyed upon graduation. 
  • An Honor Board composed of the Dean of Faculty, Dean of Student Engagement, faculty members, and students is called upon when there is an Academic Integrity Incident Report submitted to the Dean of Faculty consisting of either a second academic offense by a student or a first-time offense that is deemedegregious in natureby the Dean of Faculty.
  • The Honor Boardconveneswithin 2 weeks of the notice but not sooner than 24 hours after the submission of the notice. Deliberations of the Honor Board will follow the procedural format of the Administrative Hearings for the most serious Student Life Conduct Violations as outlined in the Student Handbook. The decision format will differ as follows.
  • The Honor Boarddeterminesby vote if the studentis responsible forthe alleged violation. If the Honor Board finds the student responsible by majority vote, a sanction issubsequentlydeterminedby the board. The sanction isdeterminedentirely by the Board and can range up to and including suspension or expulsion from the College.
  • The Honor Board’sdecisionmust be relayed in writing to the student within 3 days of theboard’sdecision.
  • Students have the right toappealthe Honor Board’s decision.Decisions on the appeal will be madeon the basis ofnew information that was previously unavailable to the Honor Board or substantive claims of flawed procedure.The appeal authority is theProvost. The procedure for the appeal follows the same format as the appeal process for Administrative Hearing decisions described in the Student Handbook.
Addendum for Students in Formal Transfer Programs with the University of Notre Dame

Gateway, Driscoll, and NPP students are expected to uphold the Academic Integrity Policy while enrolled at ֱ. If a student is found responsible by an Academic Honor Board, the Honor Board’s decision will be shared proactively with the University of Notre Dame. Other information is kept on file for one month after the student leaves and College, and it will be made available if Notre Dame requests information about the student’s academic integrity.

 AdaptedfromGoller, Steve. Cedarville University, https://www.cedarville.edu/ accessed August 9, 2024.